Legal Opinion

Orange Crush Co. v. Stacy-Merrill Fruit Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 12, 1923No. 23,446PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

In October, 1920, and during the fore part of 1921, plaintiff, a manufacturer of concentrates or flavors for soft drinks, at Chicago, Illinois, secured orders for the purchase of such goods from defendant, a wholesale dealer in such supplies at Duluth, Minnesota. After disposing of some of the goods so purchased to the retail trade, complaints as to their quality came to defendant. ■ This led to some correspondence between defendant and plaintiff respecting these complaints and the condition of the concentrates, which culminated on November 15, 1921, when defendant reshipped all the unsold…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. J. I. Case Threshing-Machine Co. v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Massari v. Accurate Bushing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Saunders v. CowlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Laganas Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. SharoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Kavli v. LeifmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API