Legal Opinion

Inland Products Corp. v. Donovan Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 1953No. Nos. 35,764, 35,889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff, a distributor of farm machinery, brought this action against the defendant, a metal fabricating concern, claiming damages for certain alleged breaches in two contracts under which the defendant was to manufacture farm implements to be sold by the plaintiff. The alleged breaches consisted of the unauthorized substitutions of critical materials and nonconformance to contract specifications which resulted in inferior and defective machines. Plaintiff sought damages for the delivery of a number of defective machines, for the noncompletion of the balance of the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Pope v. AllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Dexter Yarn Co. v. American Fabrics Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. Fishback v. G. W. Van Dusen & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  5. Rowell v. OlesonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Moosbrugger v. McGraw-Edison CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Tynan v. KSTP, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Northern States Power Company v. Itt Meyer Industries, a Division of Itt Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. American President Lines, Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Board (Now Federal Maritime Commission) and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  5. Independent Consolidated School District No. 24 v. CarlstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API