Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Horwitz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 29, 1928No. 17974PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIFFENDAFFER. C.
This is an action begun in the district court by tlie city of Tulsa to condemn a piece of land off of the southwest corner of lot 1 in block (i. original town site of the city of Tulsa.
The tract condemned was triangular in form, and its dimensions are 19.5 feet on the west, 98.5 feet on the south, and 100.5 feet on the. north and east side, that is the side which made the hypotenuse of the triangle. Defendant owned a tract 50 feet by 140 feet in (lie southeast corner of block 6, and one 100 liy 140 feet in the southwest corner of (lie block. An alley 20 feet wide running north…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Patch v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- City of Muskogee v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Stinchcomb v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Arkansas Valley & Western Railway Co. v. WittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Folsom v. BarrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Thornton v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Owens v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- State Ex Rel. City of Ardmore v. WintersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.