Stinchcomb v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, ■ Judge. Condemnation proceeding by Oklahoma City against land of Lee Stinehcomb and another for waterworks use. Upon trial by jury, defendants being dissatisfied with judgment, they bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtElting, J.
This suit is the outgrowth of a condemnation proceeding commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county, Oklahoma, by the city of Oklahoma City to condemn 83.77 acres of land belonging to the plaintiffs in error, Lee Stinehcomb and Sarah A. Stinehcomb, to be used by ‘(he city fox-constructing a system of waterworks to be used by said city.
The petition for condemnation by the city was filed on the 2nd day of February, 1917. Commissioners were appointed and took tjie oath of office on March 6, 1917, and on March 9, 1917, said commissioners filed their repoi-t in the district court, wherein…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. KinseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Rees v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
- Elder v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Gilmore v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
- Edwards v. ThrashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Allen v. Transok Pipe Line CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- City of Tulsa v. HorwitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Gaylord v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Board of County Commissioners v. LowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Southwestern Natural Gas Co. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.