Legal Opinion

Hinkley v. Eugene Water & Electric Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 13, 2003No. 16-01-18636, A118295PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Plaintiffs David G. Hinkley and Mid-Valley Presort & Mailing, Inc. (Mid-Valley) appeal from the trial court’s judgment of dismissal of their claims for declaratory and injunctive relief against defendant Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB). The court granted defendant’s ORCP 21 A motion to dismiss on the grounds of lack of standing and absence of a justiciable controversy. We affirm the dismissal as to Mid-Valley and reverse and remand as to Hinkley.

In reviewing the judgment of dismissal, we assume the truth of all facts alleged in plaintiffs’ complaint, drawing all inferences in favor of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Gruber v. Lincoln Hospital DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Savage v. MunnOregon Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simonsen v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Hicks v. Central Point School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Demartino v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Morgan v. Sisters School District 6Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Orr v. East Valley Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API