Legal Opinion

Orr v. East Valley Water District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 21, 2005No. 03C-17163; A125101PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

Petitioners appeal from a judgment dismissing their petition for a writ of review of respondent’s decision under ORS 545.099 denying petitioners’ request for exclusion of their lands from the East Valley Water District. The trial court determined that the action was not justiciable because petitioners had not shown that respondent’s denial of their request for exclusion, even if erroneous, had a practical effect on petitioners’ rights. Although the trial court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment, respondent’s justiciability argument is properly understood as a challenge to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gortmaker v. SeatonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. US West Communications, Inc. v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nordbye v. BRCP/GM EllingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Douglas County v. SmithOregon Tax Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API