Martin v. De Ornelas
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage given by defendant Ornelas and wife to their infant daughter, and subsequently assigned to the plaintiff Martin. The appellant, Harper, was a purchaser of the mortgaged real property after the mortgage was signed, acknowledged, and recorded, and before it was assigned to plaintiff. The judgment was in favor of plaintiff against all the defendants. The defendant Harper appeals from the judgment against him, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeals, on the grounds,—1. Of failure to serve…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heinlen v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Rowley v. TowsleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Sutter County v. TisdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Aldrich v. WillisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mendini v. MilnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Security Trust & Savings Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Johnson v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- King v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. DuarteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.