Legal Opinion
Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. Fall
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 13, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6750PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office which affirmed the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and 10-12 of appellants’ application for a patent on “Isoalloxazines.” Eighteen claims stand allowed by the examiner. The application was filed September 7, 1954.
The following appealed claims are representative: 1
“1. Compounds represented by the formula:
wherein R is an to -monohydroxyalkyl group containing from two to six carbon atoms inclusive, R3 and R4 are members selected from the group consisting of lower-alkyl,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Application of HenzeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- In Re HassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- Application of John P. LambooyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
3Cited by87 opinions
- Titanium Metals Corporation of America v. Donald W. Banner, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Roger W. Brown, ph.d. v. 3m, and Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Revlon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumuller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BanderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.