Legal Opinion

In Re John P. Chupp

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 15, 1987No. Appeal 86-1631PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Appeal from a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (board), affirming the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 and 12 in application Serial No. 358,967 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

On March 17, 1982, John P. Chupp (Chupp) filed a continuation-in-part application, assigned to Monsanto Company, entitled “Herbicidal 2-Haloacetanilides.” The application contained 41 claims to a variety of chemical compounds within the generic class of 2-haloacetanilides, a method for using the compounds to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumüller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BänderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  3. In re PayneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  4. Application of Rene De Montmollin and Henri RiatCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  5. Application of Carl D. LunsfordCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Burlington Industries, Inc., John D. Neefus, and Frederick M. Shofner v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  4. Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  5. In Re Eli Lilly & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API