Kath v. Brown
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered May 6, 1908, denying a petition to vacate a judgment for fraud, after a trial on the merits before the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
On the 17th day of December, 1906, a judgment was rendered by Honorable William R. Bell, acting as judge pro tempore, in an action wherein appellant was plaintiff and S. L. Brown was defendant, and the Histogenetic Medicine Company, a corporation, was intervener. The decision of the judge pro tempore was adverse to plaintiff. A motion for a new trial supported by affidavits, was introduced. We do not find the motion for a new trial or the affidavits in support thereof in the record, but the breadth of the motion can be measured by the order of the court entered on the 29th day of December,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Post v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- State ex rel. Post v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Post v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Willlams v. BreenWashington Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bolcom Mills, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Kosten v. FlemingWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- State ex rel. Prentice v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Galdwin v. City of CheneyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Gudmundson v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.