Legal Opinion

Gudmundson v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1931No. 22170. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

On January 6, 1920, S. K. Gudmund-son and wife entered into a contract with the Commercial Bank & Trust Company, of Wenatchee, to purchase from the latter twenty-eight acres of orchard land in Chelan county. Contemporaneous with the execution of that contract, Gudmundson leased the land to one Marcy on a fifty per cent crop basis, Gudmundson’s one-half to be paid to the bank (Gud-mundson ’s agent and attorney-in-fact to represent Gudmundson during his absence in Alaska), to apply towards the payment of the purchase price of the land. In 1923, Gudmundson commenced an action to rescind the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bolcom Mills, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Le Roy v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Post v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. State ex rel. Wolferman v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State ex rel. Post v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1903

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Collins v. SimmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Reeploeg v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Jurgensen v. AinscowNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Alpine Industries, Inc. v. GohlWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Ethredge v. Diamond Drill Contracting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API