Wagner v. Lectrox Corp.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff’s contention that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment was improperly allowed because he had established the existence of one or more genuine issues of material fact bearing on the enforceability of the license agreement against him is without merit. His deposition and counter affidavit did not demonstrate that such an issue existed (see Mass.R.Civ.P. 56 [e], 365 Mass. 825 [1974]; Community Natl. Bank v. Dawes, 369 Mass. 550, 553-554, 556 [1976]) and did no more than disclose that he sought relief from the terms of the agreement which he came to regard “as a bad or uneven…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Marine Contractors Co. Inc. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- O'Brion, Russell & Co. v. LeMayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Saxon Theatre Corp. of Boston v. SageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Canney v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Benson v. Massachusetts General HospitalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Great Barrington Savings Bank v. GensMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Charing Cross Corp. v. Comfed Mortgage Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Danis v. Bridge Enterprises, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979