Great Barrington Savings Bank v. Gens
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants challenge on appeal the correctness of an order of a District Court judge, sitting by designation in Superior Court, granting the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. We conclude that summary judgment was properly entered.
The judge correctly ruled that all the matters presented by the defendants in opposition to the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment “involve legal issues that may be resolved on the pleadings and affidavits or are not supported by any facts set forth in any of the affidavits or exhibits presented [in accordance with Mass.R.Civ.P. 56(e), 365 Mass. 825…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Noyes v. Quincy Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- O'Brion, Russell & Co. v. LeMayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- John B. Deary, Inc. v. CraneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
- Jerome L. Doff v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ellis v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Utah Farm Production Credit Ass'n v. WattsUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Henshaw v. CabeceirasMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- USTrust Co. v. KennedyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Royal Bank of Canada v. ConnollyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.