Legal Opinion

Danis v. Bridge Enterprises, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 15, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s contention that the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was improperly allowed because it had established the existence of a genuine issue or issues of material fact bearing on the possession and rent claims is without merit.

1. The judge sitting in the Superior Court correctly ruled that the controversy over possession had become moot; at the time of the hearing defendant had moved from the premises and the lease by its terms was terminated on February 28, 1977. He properly rejected the defendant’s argument that the rent claim should be dismissed because the summary…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. O'Brion, Russell & Co. v. LeMayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Moosman v. Joseph P. Blitz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  3. Charles E. Burt, Inc. v. Seven Grand Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Barry v. FrankiniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Malden Knitting Mills v. United States Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  2. Weinstein v. SteigmanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1983
  3. Reed v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
  4. Proteon, Inc. v. Digital Equipment Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API