Legal Opinion

Pinkerton v. Tri-County Metropolitan Service District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 28, 2005No. 0206-05884; A124359PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITHAUPT, J. pro tempore

Defendant appeals a judgment for plaintiff in this personal injury action, raising four assignments of error. Plaintiff contends that all of defendant’s assignments of error are without merit. We reverse.

Defendant’s first three assignments of error implicate the trial court’s handling of evidence related to plaintiff s claim for lost earnings. We need not reach those assignments of error, however, because we find defendant’s fourth assignment of error dispositive. That assignment of error requires us to review the necessity of expert witness testimony on the issue of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Uris v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Chouinard v. Health VenturesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Joshi v. Providence Health System of Oregon Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Howerton v. PfaffOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Baughman v. PinaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Ouma v. SkiptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Spearman v. Progressive Classic InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API