Legal Opinion

People v. Selma Irrigation District

California Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1893No. 18031PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

The defendant, the Selma Irrigation District, is a corporation organized under an act of the legislature of this state entitled “An act to provide for the organization and government of irrigation districts, and to provide for the acquisition of water and other property,” etc., approved March 7, 1887 (Stats. 1887, p. 29), and this action is brought by the people of the state to obtain a judgment dissolving said corporation and excluding it from all corporate rights and franchises. The complaint alleges that since the organization of the Selma Irrigation District as a corporation, three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Central Irrigation District v. De LappeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Turlock Irrigation District v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Crall v. Board of Directors of Poso Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. People v. TurnbullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Turlock Irrigation Dist. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. People Ex Rel. Post v. San Joaquin Valley Agric. Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Quint v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. J. C. Engleman Land Co. v. Donna Irr. Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Miller v. Perris Irrigation Dist.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API