Legal Opinion

Miller v. Perris Irrigation Dist.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California

Decided February 21, 1898No. 752PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLBORN, District Judge.

This is a suit for a decree declaring illegal and void the proceedings for the organization of the Perris irrigation district, canceling the bonds issued by said district, and enjoin*694ing the hoard of directors of said district from taking a deed to the property of complainant, heretofore sold for taxes, and also perpetually enjoining any further taxes or assessments on complainant’s land hy said district or its officers. The bill, which was filed July 20, 1897, challenges the corporate existence of said district, and also the validity of the proceedings subsequent…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  4. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Albuquerque v. Water Supply Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  2. City of Topeka v. DwyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Nelson v. Consol. Independent Sch. Dist. of Troy MillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. O'Neill v. Yellowstone Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Mitchell v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API