Legal Opinion
In re Disciplinary Action Against Pearson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 21, 2016No. A15-1818PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Director of the Office of 'Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action against Todd Curtis Pearson, alleging professional misconduct for a trust-áccourit violation and failure to cooperate with the Director’s investigation. The referee determined that Pearson violated several rules of professional conduct and recommended that we impose a public reprimand and 1 year of unsupervised probation for Pearson’s misconduct. We adopt the referee’s recommendation.
I
Todd Curtis Pearson has been licensed to practice law in Minnesota since October 23, 1992. In…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against OberhauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against RebeauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re the Discipline of CartwrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- In re Disciplinary Action against PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against David L. Ludescher, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 194347. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2023
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against David L. Ludescher, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 194347. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2023
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against David L. Ludescher, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 194347. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2023
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against David L. Ludescher, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 194347. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.