Legal Opinion

Standing v. Morosco

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 1919No. Civ. No. 1879PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

The demurrer of defendant on general and special grounds was sustained to the third amended complaint of the plaintiff and leave to further amend was denied. Judgment of dismissal followed, from which plaintiff appeale'd.

The cause of action attempted to be alleged was one for damages sustained by the plaintiff through the refusal of the defendant to use and pay for the services of the plaintiff after having employed him as an actor to appear in plays produced by the defendant in his theater at Los Angeles. Plaintiff alleged that the engagement was for a period of one year. It is respondent’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Ruinello v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Little v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Westerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Munoz v. Kaiser Steel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API