Legal Opinion

State v. Yarbor

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 1995No. 92-1146; CA A80550PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant was convicted of two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree after he pled guilty pursuant to negotiations. ORS 163.427. The agreement with the state did not include what sentence would be imposed. We held that defendant’s appeal of the sentence imposed was not reviewable and affirmed. 128 Or App 52, 874 P2d 109 (1994). We allow defendant’s motion for reconsideration, State v. Kephart, 320 Or 433, 887 P2d 774 (1994), withdraw our opinion and, on reconsideration, affirm.

In imposing sentence, the trial court classified defendant’s 1974 Alaska conviction for “Lewd or Lascivious Acts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BucholzOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. KephartOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. CastrejonOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. DvorakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RudderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. State v. JennichesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Turnbow v. K.E. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. Calderon-OrtizCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API