State v. Calderon-Ortiz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
Defendant was convicted of 10 sex offenses committed against the same victim. The trial court sentenced him to a total of 180 months in prison. He appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in imposing a consecutive sentence on one of the convictions. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
The relevant facts are mostly procedural in nature and are not disputed. Defendant was charged with six counts of rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375; one count of sodomy in the first degree, ORS 163.405; and three counts of rape in the second degree, ORS 163.365. The indictment alleged that each…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. IceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Ortega-GonsalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. GarlitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. CrewseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. PusztaiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.