Legal Opinion
Fund for Animals v. Williams
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 26, 2005No. Civil Action 03-0677 (RMU)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
GRANTING Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors’ Motion for Partial Dismissal
I. INTRODUCTION
This case comes before the court on the defendants and defendant-intervenors’ motion for partial dismissal. The plaintiffs allege that the Fish and Wildlife Service (the “FWS”) violated the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et. seq., and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706, by not preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) or an Environmental Assessment (“EA”) prior to publishing its goals in the 2000-2005…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Blue-Water Network Division v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Food and Water Watch v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Vargus v. McHughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- GETSON v. BLINKENDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Kantor v. AzarDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021