Legal Opinion

Kantor v. Azar

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 25, 2021No. 1:20-cv-02475Unknown

1Opinion

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND : RUTH E. KANTOR, M.D., : v. : Civil Action No. DKC 20-2475 : XAVIER BECERRA,1 in his official capacity as Secretary : of the Department of Health and Human Services : MEMORANDUM OPINION Presently pending and ready for resolution in this action for judicial review of an adverse agency decision is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12). The issues have been fully briefed, and the court now rules, no hearing being deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss will be denied and the parties will be directed to show cause why…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Jack Bloodsworth v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Amer Bioscience Inc v. Thompson, Tommy G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  5. Smith v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API