Harrelson Rubber Co. v. Layne
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
I
The issue is whether the court properly dismissed plaintiffs action for lack of personal jurisdiction over the nonresident defendant. We hold that G.S. 1-75.4(5) confers on our courts authority to exercise personal jurisdiction over defendant; that defendant’s activities meet the minimum contacts test; and that exercise of jurisdiction thus does not offend due process.
II
Plaintiff is a Delaware corporation with its principal office and place of business in Asheboro, North Carolina. Defendant, a sole proprietor in a tire and recapping business, is a citizen and resident of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- United Buying Group, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cherry Bekaert & Holland v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Hiwassee Stables, Inc. v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- B. F. Goodrich Co. v. Tire King of Greensboro, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Centura Bank v. Pee Dee Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.