Legal Opinion

Harrelson Rubber Co. v. Layne

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 17, 1984No. 8319SC1001PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

I

The issue is whether the court properly dismissed plaintiffs action for lack of personal jurisdiction over the nonresident defendant. We hold that G.S. 1-75.4(5) confers on our courts authority to exercise personal jurisdiction over defendant; that defendant’s activities meet the minimum contacts test; and that exercise of jurisdiction thus does not offend due process.

II

Plaintiff is a Delaware corporation with its principal office and place of business in Asheboro, North Carolina. Defendant, a sole proprietor in a tire and recapping business, is a citizen and resident of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  5. United Buying Group, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cherry Bekaert & Holland v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Hiwassee Stables, Inc. v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. Tire King of Greensboro, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Centura Bank v. Pee Dee Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API