Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. Barnett
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
This appeal is properly before us. G.S. l-277(b). Its resolution involves two questions: (1) Did defendant’s conduct bring him within the North Carolina “long-arm” jurisdictional statutes? and (2) If so, does the exercise of that jurisdiction satisfy constitutional standards of due process? Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp., 291 N.C. 674, 231 S.E. 2d 629 (1977). For reasons discussed below, we answer both questions in the affirmative.
I
Our jurisdictional statutes are to be construed liberally in favor of finding personal jurisdiction. Marion v. Long, 72 N.C. App. 585, 325 S.E.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Inspirational Network, Inc. v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Fran's Pecans, Inc. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Century Data Systems, Inc. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- New Bern Pool & Supply Co. v. GraubartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Fraser v. LittlejohnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.