Legal Opinion

United Buying Group, Inc. v. Coleman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1979No. 98PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

The sole question posed for decision is whether the trial court acquired in personam jurisdiction over defendants Lawrence H. Coleman and Morton Coleman pursuant to G.S. 1-75.4(5). To resolve this question we employ the two-step analysis suggested in Dillon v. Funding Corp., 291 N.C. 674, 231 S.E. 2d 629 (1977). First, we determine whether G.S. 1-75.4(5) of our “long arm” statute confers jurisdiction upon the superior court, which concededly has subject matter jurisdiction, to entertain this action against defendants. If our “long arm” statute confers in personam jurisdiction…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Tom Togs, Inc. v. Ben Elias Industries Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Skinner v. Preferred CreditSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Birtha v. Stonemor, North Carolina, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Filmar Racing, Inc. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Inspirational Network, Inc. v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API