Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Anselmo Mining Corp.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1928No. 6,307PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Myers

Tim R. Sullivan, claimant and respondent herein, was an employee of the Anselmo Mining Corporation, employer and an appellant herein. His work was that of a miner. May 17, 1926, in the course of his employment, Sullivan was injured by an accident, fall of ground and rock, in the employer’s mine in which he was working. He was then about thirty-nine years of age; was married and had one child. He was taken to a hospital, where he was confined for nine or ten weeks. Then he went home and was on crutches, fifteen weeks, and thereafter, used a cane. He made claim for compensation under the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. DowningCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Dosen v. East Butte Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Mellen Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Weber v. American Silk Spinning Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1915
  5. Karoly v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Landeen v. Toole County Refining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Sykes v. Republic Coal Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Willoughby v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Brurud v. Judge Moving & Storage Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Shugg v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API