Legal Opinion

Matecny v. Vielding Steel Works

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 2, 1914No. Gen. No. 19,350PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Charles M. Foell, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scanlan

The appellant relies for a reversal of the judgment upon the following alleged errors :

First. The court erroneously refused to hold the four propositions of law submitted by the appellant.

Second. It was error for the court under the admitted facts of the case to enter an order and judgment that the entire compensation be paid in a lump sum.

"The Workmen’s Compensation and Employers’ Liability Act, under which the proceedings in this case were brought, was approved June 10, 1911, and went into force May 1, 1912. (J. & A. fíj[ 5449 et seq.) The title of the act reads as follows: “To promote the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Krome v. HalbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Dietz v. Big Muddy Coal & Iron Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Maiss v. Metropolitan Amusement Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bassett v. Stratford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Karoly v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  3. Moore v. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  4. State Accident Fund v. Julia Jacobs' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  5. LaChapelle v. Union Pacific Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API