Legal Opinion

Nat. Optical Stores Co., Inc. v. Bryant

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1944PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This appeal is from a decree affirming an order of the Board of Beview of the Unemployment Compensation Division of the Tennessee Department of Labor holding "that Dr. C. H. Tenent was an employee of National Optical Stores Company, within the meaning of the Tennessee Unemployment Compensation Law.

Counsel for appellant concede that this Court is bound by the concurrent finding of the Board of Beview and Chancellor, if supported by material evidence, but it is insisted that the facts found do not as a matter of law make out a case of employment under the statute.

Appellant is the Memphis branch…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Odom v. Sanford & TreadwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Texas Co. v. Bryant, Com'r.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Guar. Mtg. Co. of Nashville v. BryantTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Finley v. KeislingTennessee Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Loser v. National Optical Stores Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Ritholz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  3. Tenn. Cartage Co., Inc. v. PharrTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Jolly Motor Livery Corp. v. AllenbergTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Reese v. HakeTennessee Supreme Court · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API