Ledford v. . Ledford
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.
The first two grounds upon which petitioner bases her motion in the cause to set aside the consent judgment entered in the present proceeding appear to be predicated upon her contention that she had not authorized her attorney to sign such judgment.
In this connection, “A judgment entered of record, whether in invitum or by consent, is presumed to be regular, and an attorney who consented to it is presumed to have acted in good faith and to have had the necessary authority from his client, and not to have betrayed his confidence or to have sacrificed his right. The law does not presume that a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Overton v. OvertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Stanley v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. CannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Van Donselaar v. Van DonselaarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- Spruill v. NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.