Harbour v. Brown for Ulrich
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOPER, Justice.
This appeal presents the single question: Can a trial judge enter a valid Order of Compromise and Dismissal after being informed by one of the parties that consent to the compromise has been withdrawn? We hold that he can not and reverse the judgment dismissing the action.
The appeal in this case is before us on the technical record only. From it we glean that an action was brought by C.B. Harbour III, seeking specific performance of an alleged real estate contract and the enjoining of a threatened foreclosure action under an existing deed of trust. The defendant filed a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burnaman v. HeatonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Van Donselaar v. Van DonselaarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- Lee v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- City of Norton Shores v. CarrMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Kittrelle v. Philsar Development Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
3Cited by28 opinions
- Neal Lovlace v. Timothy Kevin CopleyTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Barnes v. BarnesTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- Pugh's Lawn Landscape Co. v. Jaycon Development Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Page v. PageSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Ledbetter v. LedbetterTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.