Legal Opinion

Bruce v. Ullery

California Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1962No. L. A. 26893PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

To hold that the so-called deadman’s statute (Code Civ. Proe., § 1880, subd. 3) prevents a cross-defendant from testifying as to facts preceding the death of a cross-complainant in a ease in which the estate presses the cross-complaint would be to permit the use of the statute as a weapon of aggression rather than protection and to give it application beyond that of the precedents. As we point out in more detail infra, we hold that in this action of plaintiffs for injuries incurred in an intersection automobile collision the trial court erred in applying the statute to foreclose…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Nevarov v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Gray v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kopfinger v. Grand Central Public MarketCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Saupe v. KertzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  5. Buchweiser v. Estate of LabererSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API