Legal Opinion
Dunning v. Quander
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 17, 2006No. Civ.A. 03-1980(RJL)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LEON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Leonard Dunning filed the instant action alleging that defendant Paul A. Quander, in his capacity as director of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (“CSOSA” or “the Agency”) for the District of Columbia, discriminated and retaliated against him in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., respectively. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that CSOSA discriminated against him on the basis of his age…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McFarland v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Dunning v. QuanderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Swann v. Office of the Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Dave v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Nwachuku v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.