Legal Opinion
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 8, 1944No. 10642PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEE, Circuit Judge.
In proceedings had pursuant to charges filed by two C. I. O. affiliates, the National Labor Relations Board found that the Humble Oil & Refining Company had interfered with and coerced its employees in their attempt to organize for collective bargaining, and had discouraged membership in a labor organization by discharging an employee, Hervie Bradley, because of his union activities, thereby violating Subsections (1) and (3) of Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(1, 3). The order entered required that the Company:
1. Cease and desist from these…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- International Association of MacHinists Tool and Die Makers Lodge No. 35 v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- H. J. Heinz Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Continental Oil Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Oughton v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Elastic Stop Nut Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. Laister-Kauffmann Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Sewell Hats, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944