Legal Opinion

Thornburg v. James R. Bennett & Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 13, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

Plaintiff: filed an unverified petition in the municipal court of Waterloo, alleging (as amended) that the defendant is a copartnership, which maintained, on March 13, 1925, and ever since has maintained, an office- in Waterloo, for the purpose of transacting a commission and grain business; that, on March 13,1925, plaintiff deposited With defendant at its Waterloo office $1,100, with which to purchase grain, and for which defendant fails to account. None of the individuar part ners is named as a defendant. The bailiff’s'return of original notice, as set out in the abstract, reads:

‘ ‘ I…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Flexner v. FarsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. McLaughlin Brothers v. HallowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Reynolds v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crabtree v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. Elk River Coal & Lumber Co. v. FunkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  3. Davidson v. Henry L. Doherty & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. Mayer v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  5. Kelley v. the Northwest Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API