McLaughlin Brothers v. Hallowell
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP IOWA. The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this court under § 709, Rev. Stat., to review a decree of the state court denying a second petition for removal of the cause from the Federal court, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
This writ of error is sued out under § 709, Rev. Stat., and brings up a judgment of the Supreme Court of Iowa affirming a judgment of the District Court of one of the counties of that State in an action brought by the defendants in error against “McLaughlin Brothers, a Copartnership,” named-among the plaintiffs in error. The individual' plaintiffs in error, John R. McLaughlin and James B. McLaughlin, who allege themselves to be “sole members of the copartnership,” were not named as defendants at the inception of the action. Their relation to it will appear from what follows.
It is claimed by…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Chapman v. BarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Browning v. NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Pacific Live Stock Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Gay v. RuffSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.