Legal Opinion

State v. Grimes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 2, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant, William Daniel Grimes, from a judgment of the District Court of Cottonwood County, P. E. Brown, J., entered July 1, 1891, adjudging him guilty of arson in the second degree, and that he be imprisoned therefor ten years at Stillwater at hard labor.

1Opinion of the CourtDicKinson, J.

For a general term of the district court held in Cottonwood county in June, 1891, fifteen persons only (instead of twenty-three) were drawn and summoned to serve as grand jurors. They all appeared at the opening of the court, and the court then by a special venire caused eight other persons to be summoned to serve as grand jurors. All the persons so summoned (twenty-three) were then sworn as a grand jury. The defendant, who, upon a preliminary examination before a magistrate, had been required to appear at that term of the court to answer to any indictment which might be found against him,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  2. State v. McCarteySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  3. State v. FroisethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  4. Buck v. LewisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BourneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. State v. UglumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. State v. BlakeleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API