State v. Heck
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
Defendant was prosecuted and convicted in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis, upon a charge of furnishing “ one glass of spirituous liquor, to wit, whiskey,” to C., an habitual drunkard. The case presents two questions: (1) Was it nece-ssary to prove that the liquor furnished ivas whisky? (2) Was it necessary to prove that the defendant knew that C. was an habitual drunkard? 1. The prosecution ivas instituted under Gen. St. c. 16, § 11, as amended by Laws 1872, c. 61, and Laws 1875, c. 112. The section enacts that “ it shall lie unlawful for any person to * * * furnish * * * any…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barnes v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- State v. HartfielWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- Commonwealth v. GoodmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Farmer v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by33 opinions
- City of Mankato v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- State v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- State v. BridgewaterIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. DaviesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. SharpSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.