Legal Opinion

State v. Froiseth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1871PublishedCited by 6 opinions

This case comes to this court from the court of common pleas, Ramsey county, and is fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court

McMillan, J.

The defendant was indicted in the court of common pleas of Ramsey county, for the crime of extorting money.

After the indictment was filed, and before pleading, the defendant by his attorney moved to set aside the indictment because the grand jury was not charged by the court; that *314is to say, one C. L. Grant, one of the grand jury, was not present when his fellow grand jurymen were charged, and the said C. L. Grant has never been charged by the court.

It appears by the stipulation of the county attorney, and the attorney for the defendant, “ that C. L. Grant, one of the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Clapp v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. State v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
  3. Koeper v. Town of LouisvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Peterson v. FaustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  5. Colstrum v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API