Legal Opinion

State v. Bourne

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 1902No. Nos. 13,037-(25)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Bamsey county, Bunn, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Defendant was convicted of larceny in the first degree for obtaining through false pretenses a written order of the value of upwards of $7,000. He was convicted and sentenced to the state prison for ten years. A motion for new trial was overruled, from which order he appeals.

Upon the trial, evidence of a very convincing character supported the following conclusions: Defendant was a deputy auditor of Bamsey county, authorized to execute orders on the county treasurer for the refundment of moneys paid upon invalid tax certificates under the provisions of G. S. 1894, § 1697- By this law the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  2. State v. BuhnkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  3. State v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cooper, Myers & Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  2. State v. AmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Eaton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. People v. HenningerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API