Legal Opinion
City of Tucson v. Wolfe
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 7, 1995No. 2 CA-CR 94-0229, 2 CA-CR 94-0230PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Presiding Judge.
Appellants Sugaree Sands and Tracy Wolfe appeal their misdemeanor convictions for indecent exposure under Tucson City Ordinance § 11-25.1. Both women were employed as dancers in a nightclub that featured exotic entertainment when they each received a “clothing requirement violation” citation from the Tucson Police after they removed opaque material covering the nipple and areola portions of their breasts.
Before trial, Sands and Wolfe both filed motions to dismiss on the ground that the ordinance violates the equal protection guarantees of the Arizona and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Norgord v. State Ex Rel. BerningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- City of Albuquerque v. SachsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. Heidi C. Lilley The State of New Hampshire Kia Sinclair The State of New Hampshire v. Ginger M. PierroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.