Legal Opinion
Chrysler Group LLC v. South Holland Dodge, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 27, 2012No. Case Nos. 10-12984, 10-13290, 10-13908PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
SEAN F. COX, District Judge.
Following the 2009 bankruptcies of Chrysler LLC (“Old Chrysler”) and General Motors Corporation (“Old GM”), and actions taken to consolidate their respective dealer networks, Congress enacted Section 747 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, Pub.L. No. 111-117 (“Section 747”). That Act was passed to grant certain arbitration rights to dealerships that were rejected or terminated in connection with the those bankruptcies. Several dealers who had been rejected by Old Chrysler initiated, and prevailed in, Section 747 arbitrations with Chrysler…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- FCA US, LLC v. Spitzer Autoworld Akron, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Chrysler Group LLC v. Fox Hills Motor Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Executive Ambulatory Surgical Center, LLC v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
- Spitzer Autoworld Akron, LLC v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023