Legal Opinion

FCA US, LLC v. Spitzer Autoworld Akron, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 4, 2018No. 17-1161PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

In a previous case involving these same parties, we held that certain provisions of Michigan and Nevada law were preempted by a federal statute, but we upheld-as unchallenged on appeal-the district court's decision in that case that similar provisions of Ohio law were not so preempted. Spitzer Autoworld Akron, a party to the previous case, as a party on the appeal in the previous case, explicitly declined to argue preemption of the Ohio statute, but now asserts on appeal from a decision in a subsequent, independent proceeding that the Ohio statute is preempted, based on…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Watermark Senior Living Ret. Cmtys., Inc. v. Morrison Mgmt. Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. 375 Slane Chapel Road, LLC v. Stone County, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  3. Wesco Ins. Co. v. Roderick Linton Belfance, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  4. Karst Robbins Coal Co. v. OWCPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  5. Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial CorpCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API