FCA US, LLC v. Spitzer Autoworld Akron, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
In a previous case involving these same parties, we held that certain provisions of Michigan and Nevada law were preempted by a federal statute, but we upheld-as unchallenged on appeal-the district court's decision in that case that similar provisions of Ohio law were not so preempted. Spitzer Autoworld Akron, a party to the previous case, as a party on the appeal in the previous case, explicitly declined to argue preemption of the Ohio statute, but now asserts on appeal from a decision in a subsequent, independent proceeding that the Ohio statute is preempted, based on…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Watermark Senior Living Ret. Cmtys., Inc. v. Morrison Mgmt. Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- 375 Slane Chapel Road, LLC v. Stone County, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Wesco Ins. Co. v. Roderick Linton Belfance, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Karst Robbins Coal Co. v. OWCPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial CorpCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.