Legal Opinion

Chrysler Group LLC v. Fox Hills Motor Sales, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 16, 2015No. 13-2117, 13-2118, 13-2119PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

Congress — in Section 747 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 — created an arbitration procedure for automobile dealerships to seek continuation or reinstatement of franchise agreements that had been terminated by Chrysler during its bankruptcy proceedings, with the approval of the bankruptcy court. This case involves what happens when the dealerships prevail, as some did, in their statutorily-provided arbitrations.

The lawsuit below involved numerous claims, counterclaims, and cross-claims by Chrysler and various dealers. Among other things, the parties…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. FCA US, LLC v. Spitzer Autoworld Akron, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Ricardo Torres v. Precision Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  3. Rimrock Chrysler, Inc. v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Spitzer Autoworld Akron, L.L.C. v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Andy Mohr West, Inc. d/b/a Andy Mohr Toyota, Butler Motors, Inc. d/b/a Butler Toyota, and TW Toy, Inc. d/b/a Tom Wood Toyota v. Office of the Ind. Sec. of State, Auto Dealer Services Div.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API