Burns v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JENKINS, J.
Plaintiff Brian P. Bums appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. (Neiman Marcus), after its general demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages arising from an employee’s fraudulent use of checks drawn on his personal checking account to make payments on the employee’s Neiman Marcus store credit card accounts. Plaintiff argues that he has alleged sufficient facts requiring the reinstatement of his causes of action for common law negligence or, in the alternative, a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hodges v. Hertz Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Koss Corp. v. American Express Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Fonteno v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Elder v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- QDOS, Inc. v. Signature Fin., LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.