Legal Opinion
Elder v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 2012No. A130718PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*845Opinion
JENKINS, J.
Plaintiff Rex Elder, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, filed this lawsuit seeking relief against defendants Pacific Bell Telephone Company (hereafter Pacific Bell) and ACI Billing Services, Inc., doing business as OAN (hereafter OAN)1 for the inclusion of allegedly unauthorized charges on a subscriber’s telephone bill, a practice known as “cramming,” in violation of Public Utilities Code section 2890, subdivision (a). We agree with plaintiff that the superior court erred in sustaining defendants’ demurrers without leave to amend.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nolte v. Cedars Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- In re Arizona Theranos, Inc., LitigationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- In re Ariz. Theranos, Inc., Litig.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
- Wiseman Park, LLC v. S. Glazer's Wine & Spirits, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Munoz v. PatelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.