Legal Opinion

Simpson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 22, 1991No. 1646PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Simpson commenced this declaratory judgment action seeking reformation of her auto insurance policy with respondent State Farm to include underinsured motorist coverage. The trial judge denied relief. We affirm.

In February 1985, Simpson received a premium renewal notice accompanied by an insert defining underinsured motorist coverage. She did not purchase the coverage. Nothing indicates State Farm offered the coverage to Simpson after that time.

In December 1986, Simpson changed cars on her policy. At this time, State Farm also raised Simpson’s rental coverage. As a result of these…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Knight v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Jackson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Jackson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Zeigler v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Webb v. South Carolina InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Mathis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API