Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 2, 1990No. 1477PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

This is an action in equity for reformation of automobile liability insurance contracts. Andrea Michelle Jackson seeks to include underinsured motorist coverage in her written contracts of insurance with State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company as a remedy for State Farm’s alleged failure to comply with Section 38-77-160, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, as amended. This statute requires automobile insurance carriers to offer their insureds optional underinsured motorist coverage up to the limits of liability coverage. See State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Dewart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Knight v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Butler v. Unisun InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Ackerman v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  3. American Security Insurance v. HowardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Jackson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Elias v. FIREMEN'S INS. CO. OF NEWARK, NJ.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API