Legal Opinion

Webb v. South Carolina Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 22, 1991No. 23441PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Chief Justice:

Respondent Webb commenced this declaratory judgment action seeking to establish his entitlement to underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in the amount of $15,000 under his stepfather’s policy with appellant (Nationwide). The trial judge granted Webb’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

The facts are undisputed. Webb was severely injured while a passenger in his own car in April 1988. At the time, he was a resident of his stepfather’s household. Webb’s stepfather, Richard Pase, had a policy with Nationwide. The policy was first issued on May 30, 1986. On that date,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knight v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Allstate Insurance v. ThatcherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Simpson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Zeigler v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Todd v. Federated Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Georgetown Steel Co. v. Capital City Insurance (In Re Georgetown Steel Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2004
  3. Mathis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Kirven v. Central States Health & Life Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  5. Crews v. W.R. Crews, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API