Legal Opinion

Zeigler v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 12, 1990No. 23168PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Chief Justice:

This is a declaratory judgment action in which the trial judge ruled appellant (Zeigler) is not entitled to underinsured motorist coverage under her policy with respondent (Farm Bureau). We reverse.

Zeigler was injured in a collision with an at-fault motorist. She commenced this action asserting her policy with Farm Bureau should be deemed to provide underinsured motorist coverage. The trial judge found Farm Bureau made an effective offer of underinsured motorist coverage which Zeigler rejected and concluded she was therefore not entitled to the coverage.

At trial,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wannamaker Ex Rel. Estate of WannamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Dewart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Knight v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Webb v. South Carolina InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Simpson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API